Application packet
An upload form takes files, so at some point every one of these had to stop being a web page and become a PDF. That conversion loses the part that matters: in the file the citations are dead text, and you have to take the numbers on trust. So both exist. The PDF is what gets attached; the page is what you can check. They are rendered from the same source on the same run, which is why the page counts below are stated — if a file ever disagrees with its page, that is a bug and I want it visible.
For thirty years, writing about the Harvard psychiatrist John E. Mack has repeated one figure for Laurance Rockefeller's funding of his work: a million dollars, four years, $250,000 a year. The figure cites a source that says two years. And the foundation any researcher would check first to settle it — the Laurance S. Rockefeller Fund — did not exist until two years after Rockefeller was dead. The number is not merely unverified; the trail that would verify it has been pointing at the wrong door. This is the document to read first if you only read one, because it is the only one where the method produces a finding rather than describing itself.
136 episodes read end to end, every factual claim extracted, classed by what kind of evidence would settle it, and scored. The printed version is the summary; the live version is the instrument itself — 850 entities you can interrogate in the control room, twelve anomaly sites scored against one seventeen-point checklist in the atlas, and the findings the corpus turned out to contain, including the ones it never said out loud.
One page, and every claim on it that can be checked links to the thing that checks it — including a retraction, which is on the résumé because leaving it off would misrepresent how the work actually went.
Six beats for a segment on the Mack funding thread. The live page is a workbench rather than a document: each beat carries its evidence class, the source facts behind it, and the voice rule that governs it, all of which vanish when you print. The narration itself is written by hand, and any beat still empty prints a marker saying so rather than silently shipping a gap — which is why the file below is currently one page of headings.
Open, honestly. Three of the four are finished; this one is the scaffold with the prose not yet written into it. It is listed here rather than hidden because a packet that quietly omits its weakest item is making a claim about itself that the rest of this site spends its time arguing against.
Every attachment above has a live page behind it, and this page is the first of twelve that can be read straight through. It runs from here to the finding, the work sample and the résumé, then into the instrument they came out of: what the corpus examines, the evidence control room, the anomaly atlas, the Mars ledger, the guest briefings, and the stories still moving. Each page ends with the next one, named — nothing here requires the navigation.
Two pages sit outside that run because they are about the machinery rather than the application: method states how the scoring works so it can be argued with, and verification lists every check run against this site, including the ones that did not pass. If you would rather start with the person than the work, the overview is a separate and much shorter read.